17 most common logical fallacies in advertising [with examples] (2023)

Creating ads is not an easy task. Convincing an audience to buy your product or service can take a lot of persuasion. Sometimes we can turn to himLogical fallacies in advertisingto do this. Unfortunately, most of the time these are not the best tools to convince potential customers to do business with you. But what are logical fallacies? Are they even effective? Should you stay away from them, or are there instances where they can work in your favor?

What are logical fallacies in advertising?

the errors arelogically flawed statementsthis can significantly weaken your arguments. Many of us use them every day without even knowing it, especially when we get into a heated discussion where emotions run wild. For example, you may disagree with your interlocutor's point of view on an issue because of his political stance, or you may attack him because he criticizes you for something he is guilty of.

But the logical fallacy is not necessarily a matter of interpersonal conversation. You are acommon persuasion tactics in advertising campaigns, from old school billboards todigital video advertising. Your goal is usually to elicit some sort of emotional response from your viewers. at least withEmotions in video marketingIt has proven to be an effective promotional tool.

Why are errors used in advertising?

You may be wondering: do logical fallacies tend to weaken one's argument,advertisers should not avoid them? If that's the case, why are some of thebest publicityfull of mistakes? At least some of the mostcontroversial ads, like the infamous Pepsi commercial starring Kendall Jenner, have been criticized precisely because they are based on logical fallacies.

The truth is when it's done rightLogical fallacies in ads can be quite subtleand much harder to notice unless you're actively looking for them. In such cases, they have the power to deceive the viewer into believing that they are being presented with valid arguments and facts. This is not to say that the use of fallacies always impliesfalse advertising, more so that they leave him space.

Are errors in advertising effective?

As we mentioned, despite the questionable morality of using fallacies in advertising, they have the power to do so.Launch an ad campaign to fame. If you watched TV or used the Internet in the late 2000s, you probably saw Apple's "Get a Mac" campaign. What turned out to be one of Apple's most successful ad campaigns—it increased Mac sales by more than 30% and even won an award—was actually full of fallacies, and no one tried to hide it.

The campaign consisted of a series of ads featuring two people, one representing the Apple Macintosh and the other representing the PC. The two people performed skits comparing each other's features and specifications. The ads implied that PC users tend to be boring and unpopular nerds, while Apple users tend to be hip, cool, and hot.

Examples of logical fallacies in advertising

Can you identify some of the fallacies in Apple's campaign? If not, we are here to help. Let's take a look at some of theThe most common logical fallacies, how to use them, and some examples of ads with errors.

for man

The fallacy of man is involvedan attack on the integrity or character of a personinstead of your argument. It is used to discredit the adversary or the subject of the claim and make it less credible.

This is one of the most common logical fallacies in political debates and electoral campaigns.

See Also

15 logical fallacies to know, with definitions and examples

To the People (The Wagon Call)

The roving appeal is based on the assumption that thePopularity of a product or service.it is proof of its value or quality. In other words, it is trying to convince people to jump on the bandwagon.

One of the most effective logical fallacies out there, the moving car is regularly used in advertising.

appeal to ignorance

Ad Ignorance, also known asan appeal to ignorance, is a logical fallacy that assumes that something doesn't have to be true just because we don't have proof that it's true (or vice versa: just because we don't have proof that something is false, it has to be true).

Ad ignorantiam is a relatively common fallacy in everyday communication, and it's relatively easy to commit without even knowing it. However, it is not necessarily a powerful persuasion tool, so its use in advertising is quite limited.

appeal to compassion

The argument for grace is a fallacy.appeals to a person's pity. Not only is it a common fallacy of logic, but it's also quite popular.manipulation tactics. Unfortunately, this also means that it can be very effective.

It goes without saying that pity appeals are common as a powerful persuasion tool in commercials, particularly those that focus on it.Charities and donations.

appeal to authority

People tend to believe who they think they are.authority figuresWhether you're a parent, teacher, boss, or industry professional. The ad verecundiam fallacy takes advantage of this.

Appealing to authority is often very effective, as we tend to believe the people we think are the most knowledgeable. It goes without saying that this is one of the most popular persuasion techniques for many advertisers.

raises the question

Asking the question, or petitio principii in Latin, is a fallacy.uses himself to prove his own veracity. It basically states that X is true because it is true.

In other words, the principle requirement includesrepeat the same factto determine its credibility. It's not exactly the most compelling fallacy out there, which is why it's not that common in advertising.

circular reasoning

Circular Reasoning is the sneakier brother of the previous fallacy. However, there is a big difference: while the Petitio Principii is based on a single repeated statement, the petitio principii creates circular reasoning.a chain of statements that mutually prove to be true, only to return to the original. It asserts that X is true because Y is true, and Y is true because (Z is true and Z is true because) X is true.

fallacy of the wrong dilemma

The false dilemma fallacy is fairly easy to spot once you know what you're looking for. As its name indicates, it is presenteda choice between two optionswithout taking into account that there are other options outside of the two offered. It can also be a manipulation tactic.

For example, let's imagine a father trying to convince his son to eat more vegetables. Parents may ask, "Do you want vegetables for dinner?" (To which almost any child would simply say no.) Alternatively, the parent could ask, "Would you rather have carrots or cauliflower for dinner?" That gives the child afalse feeling of being able to have a say in the matter, although the result is the same: they eat more vegetables.

sunk cost fallacy

The sunk cost fallacy has its roots in economics. It assumes that since you have already invested time, money, or effort into somethingyou should keep investing, regardless of low or non-existent returns. However, the sunk cost fallacy is not limited to finance. It can refer to anything from reading a book to interpersonal relationships.

genetic error

The genetic fallacy can be quite problematic and often brings with it a series of biases and prejudices. assumes thatthe background or provenance of an object or person defines the qualitiesof the object or person.

hasty generalization

The hasty generalization error is self-explanatory. Containsdraw conclusions based on limited informationor the generalization of a group from a small number of people that integrate it.

An example of a hasty generalization would be a research study with a small number of participants, or a person who quits a particular restaurant because they were once dissatisfied with the service. might as wellAvoid considering all available informationin order to present the data in a certain way, e.g. B. the following poster:

This ad for diet pills bets you to conclude that the woman in the photo has lost weight thanks to the product. Ignore the possibility that she has been on a strict diet, exercised regularly, or had weight-loss surgery, for example.

incorrect equivalence

False equivalence is a logical fallacy that shows that two objects or people are in the samedespite obvious differences at the same level. For example, he may compare his boss to a slave owner to show how demanding the boss is, although there is an obvious difference between the two.

False equivalence is one of the most common logical fallacies in advertising, as it can demonstrate the superiority of a particular product over, say, more expensive alternatives (although in most cases a higher price indicates lower quality). high).

after that, that's why

After this, then, because of this (O after this, I will break away) you are one fallacy thatassumes that correlation indicates causation. In other words, just because two events happened one after the other, it means that the first event caused the next. A good example would be a child who assumes that just because a rooster crows just before sunrise, the rooster actually causes the sun to rise.

Post-hoc is one of the most common misconceptions in television, as ad campaigns often focus on selling an idea before the product actually sells. Commercials for men's toiletries tend to focus on the increased chance of attracting a mate, while commercials for diapers, for example, imply that the right diaper makes the baby happier and calmer.

diversion tactics

Simply put, the red herring fallacy implies thatChange the topic from a current issue to something irrelevant(or only apparently relevant). The purpose of this fallacy is to divert attention from the problem at hand and can be a clear indicator of a weak argument.

one of the mostviral marketing videosOf all time, the Old Spice commercial starring Isaiah Mustafa is full of fallacies, including red herrings. Instead of focusing on the intrinsic attributes of the product (quality ingredients, good smell, reasonable price), the commercial takes us on a wild ride from a man's bathroom to the beach and on a horse. He suggests that the use of Old Spice will make a man desirable, wealthy, and exciting.

slippery slope

You can think of the steep slope fallacy asa chain of red herrings. The slippery slope assumes that because A happened, it causes B to happen, which causes C to happen, and so on. The result is often overly dramatic and blown out of proportion to the original event. One of the most famous examples of a slippery slope is the iconic sex scene from the movie Mean Girls.

the straw man

The straw man fallacy is the plot ofoversimplifying or misinterpreting the opposition's argumentattacking him is one of the most common fallacies in real life. It usually indicates bias and a lack of a strong argument.

The iconic Budweiser commercial from the 2015 Super Bowl is a great example of the straw man fallacy in advertising. In addition to telling the audience that Budweiser craft beer is qualitatively superior, it also implies that people who drink craft beer, discuss the nuances of its flavor, and "make a fuss about it" actually don't like beer at all.

You too

Tu quoque roughly translates to "you too," and that's what this fallacy is all about. It'sdiscredits the opponent's argument as hypocritical. This is one of the most common logical fallacies, as it is a powerful tool to disarm an opponent.

Should you use fallacies in advertising?

Now that we've looked at some error ads and commercials, you probably have a better understanding of their effectiveness. Although theyshould not be the means chosen to convinceIn your campaign, if implemented correctly, they can attract more potential customers. Still, it's better to stick to something more effective.rhetorical meanto make your ads more attractive where possible.

and if you need oneHTML5 playeraMonetize your videosor play your ads (whether they contain fallacies or not), the Brid.TV platform is here for all your needs. Learn how to host, manage, and monetize videos with Brid.TV.